WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court is entering an emotionally charged dispute between the grieving father of a Marine who died in Iraq and the anti-gay protesters who picket military funerals with inflammatory messages like "Thank God for dead soldiers."

Sign up to receive FOX43 Email Alerts

The court agreed Monday to consider whether the protesters' message, no matter how provocative or upsetting, is protected by the First Amendment or limited by the competing privacy and religious rights of the mourners.

The justices will hear an appeal from a Marine's father to reinstate a $5 million verdict against the protesters after they picketed outside his son's funeral in Maryland four years ago. Members of a Kansas-based church have picketed military funerals to spread their belief that U.S. deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq are punishment for the nation's tolerance of homosexuality.

The funeral protest dispute was one of three cases the court said it would hear in the fall. The protest lawsuit stemmed from picketing by members of the fundamentalist Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kan., outside the funeral for Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder in Westminster, Md. Snyder died in March 2006 when his Humvee overturned.

The funeral was one of many that have been picketed by Westboro pastor Fred Phelps and other members of his church. One of the signs at Snyder's funeral combined the U.S. Marine Corps motto, Semper Fi, with a slur against gay men.

Other signs carried by church members read, "America is Doomed," "God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11," "Priests Rape Boys" and "Thank God for IEDs," a reference to the roadside bombs that have killed many U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Snyder's father, Albert, sued Phelps, his daughters and the church and won more a verdict of more than $11 million for emotional distress and invasion of privacy. The judge reduced the amount to $5 million, but a federal appeals court threw out the verdict altogether.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the signs contained "imaginative and hyperbolic rhetoric" protected by the First Amendment.

Shirley Phelps-Roper, a defendant in the lawsuit and one of Phelps' daughters, said she is pleased the case is going to the Supreme Court. "We get to preach to the conscience of doomed America," she said in an interview Monday. "I am so excited that I can't I tell you how good it is."

Albert Snyder and his attorneys talked to reporters on the steps of the York County Court House Tuesday morning. Snyder maintains following through with this case is not about the money. "There are other military families who have gone through the same thing, and are still going through the same things that I am. And I know what it feels like. I don't want to see anybody else hurt the way my family was." One of his attorneys, Sean Summers, says he is not surprised by the highest court's decision to hear the case. "Statistically, the number of cases heard by the Supreme Court is so low. Having said that, this is the type of case they will hear."

The Supreme Court is expected to review the case in the next several months. A final decision is expected within 12-18 months.